|
| |
Jallist Archive May 2005
Re: Some thoughts
From: "fpinkse" <pa2fap(at)hotmail.com>
Date: 02 May 2005 08:29:55 -0000
Hello Wouter,
I agree with you the effort should go into this bank and page problem
on which I raised a flag in some earlier posts.
I need this volatile for the input as you explained earlier.
With best regards,
Frans.
--- In jallist@yahoogroups.com, "Wouter van Ooijen" wrote:
> > Thank you for pointing out a serious pitfall, most apriciated.
> > I frogot about this aspect, good that you straightend that out.
> > Then let me add something to the code and then it will look like this:
> >
> > movf ,0
> > movwf
> > btfss ,2
> > bcf
> > btfcs ,2
> > bsf
> This takes 6 instructions, the current translation takes 7 on 4-page
> targets, 5 on 1-page targets. I think effort to reduce redundant page
> instructions would be more justified than effort to spent on this rather
> spcial case.
>
> BTW do you realy need the target to be volatile?
>
> Wouter van Ooijen
>
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
|
|
|